In accordance with the decision of the jury of the Resonance competition, approved Protocol of November 24, 2018, materials of the 1st (correspondence) round of the review (competitive video recordings) were evaluated according to 4 criteria:
1. compliance with the goals and objectives of the competition;
2. content, information literacy in the presentation of educational material;
3. originality of pedagogical solutions;
4. teacher’s speech culture.
Each criterion was scored on a 3-point scale. It was allowed to additionally reward the participant with 1-3 points for demonstrated qualities that were not reflected in the criteria (as a special opinion of a jury member).
Based on the results of the first (correspondence) round of the review:
- competitors who scored from 0 to 6.99 points were awarded the title “Competition Participant”;
- competitors who scored from 7.00 to 8.99 points were awarded special diplomas;
- Contestants who score 9.00 points and above are allowed to participate in the II (in-person) round of the competition.
Reviews of the 2nd (in-person) round of the competition will be held on December 1 and 8, 2018 at the site of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Educational Institutions for the Central Educational Institution and the International Educational Establishment “Radost” from 10.00 to 18.00.
From 18.00 (!) on November 26, registration for a convenient time to participate in the face-to-face stage is available via the link.
The duration of an open lesson (rehearsal, master class) at the full-time stage of the competition according to the regulations will be 20 minutes; an additional 10 minutes are allocated for an interview with members of the jury, during which the contestants answer questions about their professional activities.
COMPETITORS WHO SCORE 9.00 POINTS OR HIGHER
(ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE II PERSONAL ROUND OF THE COMPETITION)
- Afonina Olga Evgenievna
- Varlamova Victoria Valerievna
- Vasilyeva Svetlana Anatolevna
- Volkova Natalya Valerievna
- Gelman Yulia Grigorievna
- Gemusova Daria Anatolyevna
- Guseva Svetlana Ivanovna
- Zharova Elena Valentinovna
- Zhuravleva Ulyana Nikolaevna
- Ivashkina Irina Anatolevna
- Ionova Svetlana Yurievna
- Konovalova Galina Vasilievna
- Kostomarov Rostislav Sergeevich
- Kryukova Natalya Yurievna
- Liring Svetlana Evgenievna
- Lishchenko Anastasia Viktorovna
- Maklakova Natalya Vladimirovna
- Moskovchuk Anna Alekseevna
- Nezadorova Tatyana Evgenevna
- Pereverzeva Irina Anatolyevna
- Poydo Maria Ivanovna
- Tarasova Elena Andreevna
- Chistyakova Anastasia Alexandrovna
COMPETITORS WHO SCORE FROM 7.00 TO 8.99 POINTS
(BY DECISION OF THE JURY AWARDED SPECIAL DIPLOMA)
- Anisimova Tatyana Viktorovna
- Burmistrova Tatyana Petrovna
- Vlasova Elena Alexandrovna
- Vlasova Olga Vasilievna
- Goryacheva Olga Vladimirovna
- Ivanova Anastasia Lvovna
- Kurdyukova Svetlana Vladimirovna
- Kurzanova Zinaida Yurievna
- Please Margarita Anatolyevna
- Pozhinailo Margarita Vladimirovna
- Potapova Anastasia Viktorovna
- Rozanova Irina Sergeevna
PRESIDENT OF THE JURY:
Plenipotentiary expert of the Council for Grants of the President of the Russian Federation to support creative projects of national importance in the field of culture and art, member of the jury of the All-Russian competitions “Teacher of the Year of Russia”, “I Give My Heart to Children”, Ph.D., Professor of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Further Professional Education "Center for the Implementation of State Educational Education" politics and information technology”, recipient of medals K.D. Ushinsky, "Patriot of Russia", medals "For outstanding services" of the Russian Academy of Education
Lidia Petrovna DUGANOVA
MEMBERS OF THE JURY:
Honored Teacher of Russia, Excellence in Public Education, laureate of the Moscow Grant competition in the field of innovative technologies in the field of music education
Nadezhda Vasilievna SEMINA
Methodologist of additional education of the highest category, member of the jury of the competition “Teacher of the Year” in the nomination “Teacher of Additional Education”, member of the Expert Council of the competition of author’s programs of additional education
Elena Nikolaevna FIGINA
1. General Provisions
1.1. The Moscow city competition of professional skills of additional education teachers “Resonance” 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the “Competition”) is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the system of additional education for children in Russia - a special type of education aimed at the comprehensive development of intellectual, spiritual, moral, physical, creative and professional child's needs.
1.2. The competition is held in September - December 2018.
1.3. The competition involves:
Identification and dissemination of effective educational practices in the field of mass musical and aesthetic education of children and youth (including children with disabilities);
Creating conditions for the exchange of professional experience between additional education teachers implementing relevant educational programs;
Support for additional education teachers who reveal the educational and culture-forming potential of musical art in working with children, adolescents and young people.
1.4. The competition is held within the framework of the Moscow city comprehensive targeted youth education program “The Children of Moscow Sing.”
1.5.Purpose of the competition- identification, support and development of effective educational practices and pedagogical technologies in the field of mass musical and aesthetic additional education of children and youth.
1.6.Competition objectives:
- Identification and retransmission of the achievements of additional education teachers implementing artistic and social-pedagogical programs in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth.
- Popularization of musical and performing arts among children and youth as an effective medium for the artistic, civil, patriotic, spiritual and moral education of the younger generation.
- Support for additional education teachers who implement the most effective technologies for mass musical and artistic education of children, adolescents, and young people, broadcasting their achievements in the open educational space of the Russian capital.
- Transmission of pedagogical ideas for updating the content of additional musical and aesthetic education for children and youth.
- Support for teachers implementing programs for additional musical and aesthetic development in working with children with disabilities.
- Development of an integral system of mass musical education in the space of general and additional education in Moscow.
- Development of interaction and integration of resources of the city’s general and additional education systems.
- Attracting the attention of government authorities, commercial organizations, and the general public to the educational and socializing resources of the system of mass musical and aesthetic additional education for children and youth.
2. Organizers of the competition
2.1. The founder of the Competition is the Organizing Committee of the Moscow City Comprehensive Targeted Program for Youth Education “The Children of Moscow are Singing”.
2.2 The direct organizer of the competition is the GBOU DO “Center for Creative Development and Musical-Aesthetic Education of Children and Youth “Joy” - the leading institution of the city of Moscow in the field of mass musical-aesthetic and artistic education of youth, the operator of the Moscow Department of Education for the implementation of the Moscow City Comprehensive Target Program education of youth “The children of Moscow are singing.”
2.3. Official information about the Competition, its regulations and results is posted on the website of the City Program “Moscow Children Sing” ( singchildrenofmoscow.rf ).
3. Participants of the competition
The Moscow city competition of professional skills of additional education teachers “Resonance” is attended by teachers who implement additional general education (general developmental) programs in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth and work with creative groups and students in the system of institutions subordinate to the Moscow Department of Education.
4. Competition nominations
The competition is held in 11 categories:
- "Leaders and choirmasters of choirs"
- "Leaders of academic vocal ensembles"
- "Leaders of pop vocal ensembles"
- "Leaders of vocal and instrumental ensembles"
- "Leaders and choirmasters of folklore groups"
- “Leaders of instrumental groups of the academic direction”
- “Leaders of groups of Russian folk instruments”
- “Leaders of instrumental pop groups”
- “Teachers of associations of musical-aesthetic, musical-theoretical development of children” (classes in solfeggio, listening to music, rhythm, collective singing and playing music on elementary instruments, etc.)
- “Teachers of individual classes in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth (classes in learning to play musical instruments, individual vocals, composition, etc.)
- “Teachers of associations for the musical and aesthetic development of children with disabilities”
5. Conditions and procedure for the competition
5.1. Moscow city competition of professional skills of additional education teachers “Resonance” takes place in 2 rounds :
- 1st round - correspondence;
- Round 2 - full-time.
5.2. For the first round, participants provide short summary , and video that presents the practice of their work with children's creative groups, students (according to the declared nominations). These can be fragments of classes, master classes, rehearsals and other forms of educational work.
5.3. Requirements for competition materials of the 1st round:
The teacher himself, as well as the student(s) with whom he is working, should be clearly visible in the video recording.
Duration of video recording: 10-15 minutes. Videos of longer duration will not be considered.
Videos are posted on open video hosting sites: YouTube, Rutube or uploaded to file hosting services; links are sent to the Organizing Committee of the competition.
In the resume, the competition participant lists his main creative achievements, the merits of children's creative groups, the students with whom he works, and briefly characterizes the basic principles, methods and pedagogical technologies that he uses in educational practice. The resume should not exceed 3,000 characters including spaces.
5.4. Admission to participation in the second round of the Competition is carried out by decision of the competent jury.
5.5. The participant who, by decision of the jury, has passed to the second round of the competition, conducts open lesson with students (rehearsal, master class) according to a special schedule approved by the Organizing Committee, at one of the venues (in agreement with the Organizing Committee):
On the basis of the educational organization in which he works;
On the basis of the educational organization of the curator of the Moscow Children Singing Program in the district (in agreement with the curator);
On the basis of GBOU DO TsTR and MEO "Joy" (Mikhalkovskaya St., 22).
5.6. Requirements for competition materials of the 2nd round:
An open educational session (rehearsal, master class) should comprehensively represent the professional competencies of the teacher, demonstrate established techniques in solving special educational problems, overcoming difficulties by students, and reflect the nature of the relationship with students.
Before the lesson, the participant provides the jury members with open lesson plan (rehearsals, master classes). The plan includes: the participant’s full name, his place of work, the full name of the event, purpose, objectives, lesson notes.
5.7. Duration of an open lesson (rehearsal, master class): 30-45 minutes. The specified time includes a short interview with members of the jury, during which the contestants answer questions about their professional activities.
5.8. The jury fully reviews the open classes of all participants in the competition who made it to the 2nd round and makes a final assessment according to the following criteria (see paragraph 6 of these Regulations).
5.9. Following the results of the competition, an educational and practical conference is held with an award ceremony for participants and winners.
5.10. Approximate schedule of Competition events:
|
Event |
Deadlines |
Location |
|
Submitting applications for participation in the professional skills competition for additional education teachers “Resonance” |
remotely, website of the Moscow Children Singing Program ( singchildrenofmoscow.rf) |
|
|
I(correspondence) round of the competition - qualifying review of presentation videos and resumes of teachers sent to the competition |
remotely, GBOU DO TsTR and MEO "Joy" |
|
|
II(in-person) round of the competition - viewing of open lessons, classes, rehearsals, master classes of participants who took place inIIround of the competition |
sites of educational organizations in Moscow, GBOU DO TsTR and MEO "Joy" |
|
|
Final educational and practical conference. Award ceremony for participants and winners of the competition |
11.00 |
White Hall GBOU DO TsTR and MEO "Joy" |
6. Criteria for evaluating competitive performances
1. Compliance with the goals and objectives of the competition.
3. The ability to establish emotional contact, partnership, creatively productive relationships with students.
4. The ability to organize interaction between students (create conditions for the development of communication skills, partnership skills and educational interests of each student).
5. The ability to create and maintain a high level of motivation and intensity of educational activity of students in the classroom.
6. The teacher’s own performing and professional skills in the represented field of creative activity.
7. Originality of pedagogical solutions, skill and resourcefulness in overcoming problematic situations.
8. Speech culture of the teacher.
9. Depth and accuracy of analysis of the training session, reflection on the results of one’s activities (for the full-time tour).
7. Competition jury
7.1. The jury of the Resonance competition includes famous figures in Russian education and performing musicians.
7.2. The composition of the jury of competitions in nominations will be announced additionally.
8. Regulations for evaluating competitive performances
8.1. Competitive performances of participants are evaluated according to a rating system. The rating is formed from the sum of assessments of competitive performances in accordance with the above criteria (clause 6 of these Regulations) according to a 3-point rating system for each criterion, as well as taking into account the possibility of receiving additional points as a “dissenting opinion of a jury member.”
8.2. The maximum number of evaluation points for the 2nd (full-time) competitive performance by each jury member is 30 points:
Based on the totality of criteria - 27;
As a “dissenting opinion of a jury member” - no more than 3.
Grand Prix (29.00 - 30.00 points);
Laureate of the 1st degree (27.00 - 28.99 points);
Laureate of the 2nd degree (25.00 - 26.99 points);
Laureate of the III degree (23.00 - 24.99 points);
Diploma holder (20.00 - 22.99 points);
Participant (9.00 - 19.99 points).
8.4. The decision of the jury is documented in a protocol. Appeals from jury decisions are not accepted.
8.5. The results of the competition are published on the website of the City Program “Moscow Children Sing” (singchildrenofmoscow.rf).
8.6. The jury has the right to award the participant a special diploma for the professional pedagogical competencies clearly demonstrated at the competition.
9. Legal rules for participation in the competition
9.1. By submitting an application and materials for the “Resonance” competition, the teacher indicates agreement with these Regulations and guarantees that:
According to these competition materials, he has no obligations to third parties that would prevent the publication of materials on the sites of the Organizing Committee of the competition, the copyright law has been complied with;
All materials that do not have links to any sources are copyrighted;
Photos and videos of minors are posted with the consent of their legal representatives (parents, guardians, etc.);
The author(s) grant(s) the right to the Organizing Committee of the festival-competition to use materials, video recordings of the teacher’s competitive performance or part thereof indicating the author(s) at its discretion without additional agreement with him/her and without paying royalties in his projects, in including for the purpose of popularizing this competition, broadcasting the best teaching practices in the press, at various conferences and business meetings, as well as in the form of publications.
9.2. In case of recorded violations of copyright (i.e. borrowing of other people's works or their significant fragments without reference to authorship), the competition performance is not considered by the jury.
On November 8, a ceremonial award ceremony took place following the results of the Professional Excellence Competition of the SRO Association “School Without Danger” for the best organization of work in the field of security of educational organizations in Moscow.
The competition was held from April 1 to October 30, 2017 and consisted of five stages, during which the jury evaluated the participants according to various criteria. The competitors, with the support of their private security organizations, created video presentations, demonstrated theoretical knowledge and passed the stage of testing practical security skills at checkpoints.
Twenty-nine of the best professionals in ensuring the security of educational organizations were identified, from among whom six finalists were selected to take prizes.
The President of the SRO Association “School Without Danger” Sergei Saminsky in his opening speech emphasized that such a competition is not just an initiative of the organization’s leadership, but also an undertaking that is universally supported by the state. Recently, the President of the Russian Federation congratulated the winners of the international professional skills competition WorldSkills. Russia first took part in this competition in 2013. Then our team did not take a high place. Now we are leaders in the training of blue-collar professions.
The security industry has also joined this initiative. The team of the SRO Association “School Without Danger” became a pioneer in this matter. Perhaps in the future the criteria for selecting and evaluating participants in the competition, as well as its other nuances, will change. But the main thing is that it has begun.
We will continue competitions,” emphasized Sergei Saminsky. - Since the apparatus of all private security structures, a self-regulatory organization, all functionaries exist only so that the guards at the post at the right moment clearly and professionally fulfill their duties. And we will do everything to improve their skills.
The head of the working group of the Coordination Council for Security of the Moscow Department of Education, Alexey Zhuravlev, said what, in his opinion, is fundamental in the work of security.
An integral part of your job is the ability to instantly navigate complex environments. This is the most important thing: to be able to react correctly to an incident and thereby save the lives and health of those who are in the educational organization. Comparing with the situation in 2010, I can say that the level of professional training of security guards has increased. I ask you all to maintain the level you have reached now.
Sergey Saminsky noted representatives of the SRO Association “School Without Danger”, without whom the competition would not have taken place. Among them are SRO Vice President for Scientific and Methodological Work Nikolay Stepanov, Head of the SRO Professional Qualification Training Center Tatyana Zaretskaya, SRO Executive Director Maria Shapkina and others.
This event gave a lot to improve our educational process and our work in general,” said Nikolai Stepanov. - We noted both the positive qualities, knowledge and skills of our security guards, as well as those nuances that need to be paid more attention to in the future.
Tatyana Zaretskaya, who first proposed the idea of holding a professional skills competition, said that this tradition has a long history. However, she recalled that such a competition was held for the first time in the security community.
You are the best in your profession. The status of a winner is good, but it requires a lot. Therefore, I wish you further professional development, I wish you not to give up your professional positions.
The head of the expert department of the SRO Association “School Without Danger”, Vadim Yelensky, who became one of the examiners during the on-site knowledge tests of the competitors, shared his opinion about the competition.
Private security organizations were given a difficult task - to select the best employees to participate in the competition. Based on the results, we can say that they approached this in good faith and with the utmost responsibility. We truly have the best of the best.
Maria Shapkina, executive director of the SRO Association “School Without Danger”, also addressed warm words to the contestants:
The most worthy representatives of the profession have gathered here. Each of you, I emphasize, each of you, regardless of whether he took a prize or not, is already a winner. We can say with full confidence that all of you perform your job duties not only conscientiously and responsibly, but also with soul. We have repeatedly seen during inspections how respect and love children treat you with. In our opinion, this is the most important indicator of your work.
Who are these people who showed outstanding results among thousands of their colleagues, many of whom are also undoubtedly worthy of praise, who coped with anxiety, and did not get confused in the face of sometimes tricky questions from inspectors? Let's introduce them.
Third place was shared by the security guard of Euro-Alliance LLC E.V. Sergeeva and security guard of SOBR LLC private security company N.N. Zharikov. They received a bonus of fifty thousand rubles each, a diploma signed by the president of the SRO Association “School Without Danger” Sergei Saminsky and letters of gratitude from the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Anatoly Vyborny and the deputy of the Moscow City Duma Inna Svyatenko.
Second place - security guard of Private Security Company "Shield" LLC A.N. Belous and security guard of LLC Private Security Company "South-Delta" S.A. Pankov. They also received a diploma signed by Sergei Saminsky and letters of gratitude from Anatoly Vyborny and Inna Svyatenko. The cash prize was one hundred thousand rubles each.
The winners were the security guards of LLC Private Security Company "SOBR" D.P. Gamzyukov and E.A. Kovaleva. In addition to a diploma signed by Sergei Saminsky and letters of gratitude from Anatoly Vyborny and Inna Svyatenko, they received a cash prize of two hundred thousand rubles each and a trophy - a challenge cup for the winner of the professional skills competition.
Denis Gamzyukov, thanking the organizers of the event, expressed his conviction that it is impossible to stop at one competition. “We need to strengthen this experience for the sake of the most important thing - children and their safety,” he said. Elena Kovaleva expressed gratitude to the creators of the competition for providing the security guards with the opportunity to prove themselves.
The real winner of the competition was the Euro-Alliance Group of Companies, several of whose representatives were among the best in their profession. The Group's Executive Director Nikolay Aksenov shared how this success was achieved.
We took this competition very seriously, conducting a thorough internal selection, one might say, an internal competition. We considered each candidate both from the point of view of his current condition and from the point of view of his ability to learn, having invested a lot of work in the preparation process. Each competition increases the prestige of the profession. Any athlete will tell you that the best training is competition. Any competition is better than classroom training. This competition is a concentration of experience and knowledge, their adjustment and understanding. Its meaning is that at the end of it we have become smarter and more professional.
All members of the jury note that during the competition they did not see anyone indifferent, and each guard put their maximum effort into this competition.
The security community needs such a competition. Its importance is evidenced by the support provided to the organizers by Russian State Duma deputy Anatoly Vyborny and Moscow City Duma deputy Inna Svyatenko, who highly appreciated the idea of such a competition. Therefore, no one doubts: next year a new competition will be held, and its winners will demonstrate an even higher level of professional skill.
Press service of SRO Association “School without danger”
Class:
In order to improve the quality of vocational training, promote blue-collar professions, and improve the forms, methods and means of industrial training, the school held a professional skills competition to identify creative youth mastering blue-collar professions.
The main objectives of the competition are to improve the professional skills of students, identify and encourage the best students in construction specialties; increasing the importance and prestige of the construction profession.
The professional skills competition among school students was held on the basis of the order of the director of the institution No. 287 “O” dated December 5, 2008. The same order approved the Regulations on the competition, the composition of the organizing committee, the composition of the jury, the action plan and the appointment of a responsible administrator (deputy director for management and development). The duration of the competition is from 12/08/2008 to 01/23/2009.
The preparation and holding of the professional skills competition was carried out by an organizing committee, which included:
To evaluate the results, a jury was created consisting of:
A professional skills competition to identify the “Best in Profession” among students is held annually. In the 2008-2009 academic year, the competition took place in several stages:
1) holding a professional skills competition among students within the study group;
2) holding a competition of professional skills among students for each profession separately.
The opening of the professional skills competition was held in a solemn atmosphere on December 11, 2008 at the school assembly. The director's order to hold the competition, the composition of the jury and the organizing committee were announced, and the schedule of events was posted on the stand. The opening was accompanied by a multimedia presentation, the content of which regulated the procedure for holding the competition and historical moments of last year's competitions. Each group was given a symbolic “outfit” to participate in the competition.
In preparing for professional skills competitions by profession, a whole system of organizational and pedagogical measures was carried out:
1. Improving the educational and material base of workshops, in particular, building materials for joiners (plywood sheets) were purchased, gloves were purchased for masons, and products were purchased for chefs and pastry chefs.
2. The organizing committee of the competition selected a rational set of educational and production work for participants in the competition to identify the best in a specific profession.
3. The developed tasks for theoretical training of participants in the professional skills competition contained a precise formulation of the purpose of the task in accordance with the content of the educational program documentation.
4. The content and quantity of production work that had to be performed by the competition participants were clearly defined.
5. Time standards for completing work have been established.
6. The capabilities of workshop equipment, the degree of preparedness of students, the demand for manufactured products in the daily life of the school, and the amount of material covered in special subjects were taken into account.
7. The scope of work performed was selected from the list of trial qualifying works in the profession for category IV.
8. The necessary educational and technical documentation was developed. Every student was provided with it.
Before the start of each profession competition, a ceremonial formation of participants was held. The deputy chairman of the jury announced the competition tasks to the competition participants and handed over envelopes with tasks. The initial stage included a theoretical task in the form of a test for knowledge of special technology, terms, materials science by profession, the second stage was the implementation of a production task.
The results of the professional skills competition for the best student in the profession were summed up by the jury through open voting. Members of the competition jury assessed the practical work of the competition participants and the level of their theoretical training within the limits established by the competition tasks. During the competition, jury members monitored the correctness of work practices, technological literacy of work, time required to complete tasks, and compliance with labor protection and safety requirements.
The winners of the competition were determined based on the best performance in completing the competition tasks. The main criteria for assessing the results of completing competition tasks were:
- labor productivity and quality of completed tasks;
- level of theoretical training;
- application of rational techniques and methods of work;
- fulfillment of student time standards (production) for the competition task;
- the degree of production independence of the student when performing competitive tasks; rationality of labor and workplace organization;
- compliance with labor safety requirements when performing competitive tasks.
If the indicators established for the competition were equal between two participants, preference was given to the student with the best indicator in industrial training.
The competition jury drew up nine protocols on the results of the professional skills competition, reporting the results and indicating the winners.
1. Based on the results of the intra-school competition “Best in the profession “Master of Finishing Construction Works” among first-year students, it was decided to award:
2. Based on the results of the intra-school competition “Best in the profession “Master of finishing construction works” among the 2nd and 3rd year students, assign:
3. Based on the results of the intra-school competition “Best in the profession “Master of Civil Works””, among students of the 2nd and 3rd year, assign based on the final statement:
4. First year students (group No. 2) were awarded certificates of encouragement:
“For strong knowledge of the theory of stone work”:
Grigoriev Nikolay,
Volkov Andrey,
Vasiliev Dmitry.
"For the desire to win":
Nikitin Sergey,
Krdyshov Sergey,
Kudryashov Arthur.
5. Based on the results of the intra-school competition “Best in the profession “Master of Joinery and Carpentry””, assign based on the final sheet:
6. Based on the results of the intra-school competition “Best in the profession “Auto Mechanic” among the 2nd and 3rd year students, assign:
7. Based on the results of the in-school competition “Best Chef by Profession”, award:
The winners of the competition who took prizes were awarded certificates, they were awarded the title “Best in Profession” and were awarded certificates and valuable prizes during the final competition “Rainbow of Professions”.
Creative competitions were aimed at identifying talented youth through intensifying the work of the self-government body in the group, implementing tasks to unite the student body, revealing the facets of students’ talent, as well as developing students’ supra-professional competencies.
In the “My Profession” wall newspaper competition, the places were decided to be distributed as follows:
In the nomination “Exhibition of technical creativity of students within the framework of the professional skills competition “Best in Profession 2009”” places were distributed as follows:
2. In a research competition
Professional skills competitions
as a means of creative self-realization
teaching staff.
A competition is a competition aimed at identifying the best among the participants. Competitions of pedagogical excellence can be considered as a stage in increasing the professionalism of teachers, as an open mass pedagogical competition for teachers. A teacher focused on professional growth strives to make himself known to the general public in order to improve his teaching skills and disseminate his work experience. Professional competitions are not only serious creative tests for the best teachers. Their implementation contributes to the effective development of the domestic school education system and the widespread introduction into practice of new interesting methods and approaches to teaching.
Pedagogical excellence competitions are held in order to increase the prestige and status of teachers in society, identify and study new directions in the theory and practice of management in the field of education, support innovative developments and technologies that contribute to the development of the education system and have an effective impact on the process of education and upbringing.
The content of professional competitions is not chosen arbitrarily; it must be subordinated to solving the main problems facing the education system. Each competition carries its own meaning, determined by its nominations.
Competitions can be full-time and correspondence. But, as a rule, all distance competitions held on the Internet are commercial in nature and are not of particular significance. One of the main and significant pedagogical competitions is “Teacher of the Year” or “Teacher of the Year,” which can complement and even replace many other administrative methods for evaluating team members for school and municipal education system leaders: control, interviews, annual certifications. Competition has advantages over them as a much more democratic mechanism for assessing and rewarding the work of teachers and managers. And the higher the status of the competition by stage (school, municipal, regional, all-Russian), the more prestigious is participation in it.
An analysis of work experience at school allows us to identify the following types of competitions that are most often used in working with educational institutions teachers:
review-competitions of the subject-development environment,
competitions of methodological, educational and methodological materials,
professional skills competitions,
competitions with the participation of children, where preparation is provided by the teachers of the educational institution.
| Type of competition | Current tasks being implemented during the competition |
| Views- competitions subject- development environment | Creating conditions for children’s cognitive activity, etc. Encouraging teachers to be creative, revealing creative abilities, imagination and fantasy. Identifying positive experiences of teachers. |
| Competitions methodological, educational and methodological materials | Stimulating the growth of professional skills of teachers, promoting the development of research in teaching activities. Promoting the implementation of the priority national project “Education”. Identification of creative teachers engaged in innovative pedagogical activities. Identification and support of innovative projects and methods. Formation of the need to study and implement new generation programs in working with children. Generalization of work experience. Orienting teachers towards innovation, experimentation, forecasting. Determining the most effective ways to implement the Concept of modernization of the education system. |
| Competitions professional excellence | Increasing the prestige of the professions “teacher” and “educator”. Identification of talented teachers. Propaganda and dissemination of advanced pedagogical experience, creation of a data bank. Stimulating the work of a teacher. Expanding the range of communication between creative teachers. Demonstration of the capabilities of new pedagogical technologies and new forms of working with children. Increasing the creative activity of teachers, creating conditions for personal and professional self-realization. Activation of innovative work, identification and support of innovative teachers in the process of mastering modern programs, methods and technologies for the development, education and training of children. |
| Competitions involving children | Identifying positive experiences in teaching and raising children. Identification of gifted children. Creating conditions for the development of children’s abilities and the creative potential of teachers. Intensifying the activities of teachers to introduce various creative techniques into working with children. Developing children's skills in expressive poetry reading, updating and diversifying their song repertoire. Development of teachers' directing skills and abilities. Stimulating the creative search of teachers in selecting methods and technologies for teaching children how to compose creative stories. |
There are several approaches to selecting competition participants: self-nomination, nomination by the professional community - the entire teaching staff or groups of teachers, as well as a combination of all three options. As you know, the most worthy ones do not necessarily become participants in competitions. A teacher who has all the qualities of a potential winner may never participate in any competition. On the contrary, a teacher who does not show even average results in his work can be nominated and win. Why do teachers participate or, conversely, refuse to participate in competitions?
Usually, the status of a teacher is determined by the current assessment of his activities by the administration of the educational institution. Sometimes the assessment develops spontaneously or under the influence of the teacher’s attitude to work, his loyalty to the administration, and is not always objective. Pedagogical excellence competitions help eliminate this contradiction.The desire to participate in professional competition is expressed primarily by teachers, who are not frightened by the situation of achievement, but, on the contrary, stimulated. They tend to have high levels of aspirations, as well as motivation and the ability to achieve. These are definitely people striving for success. However, they can consider success as both real professional achievements confirmed by victory in the competition, and the rewards they expect to receive upon becoming a winner: recognition, fame, status in the team, bonus, category, opportunity to receive departmental awards, etc. The main motivation for participation in the competition is both internal and external.
At the same time, the intention to avoid failure in current work also serves as motivation for participation in the competition. This is a kind of protest reaction to an unfair assessment of the administration, a desire to rehabilitate. Not finding recognition, the teacher strives to prove his worth by participating in school, district or city competitions. Thus, the behavior of a competition participant may be dominated by both motives for achieving success and avoiding failure. At the same time, it is well known that among good specialists there are very few who strive to participate in competitions. What's the matter, why do many teachers dislike competitions so much?
A competition is a public performance by a teacher in front of colleagues, a stressful, tense situation that can bring success and recognition, as well as failure. Probably, a considerable group consists of teachers who are not very confident in themselves, restraining their ambitious impulses, regretting their passivity. Their aspirations and self-esteem are high, and their passivity is a desire to avoid possible failure. As a rule, such teachers are anxious, and participation in the competition requires them to spend a lot of nerves. The mere mention of the competition evokes unpleasant emotions in them. However, such teachers should remember that if they do not decide to participate in a professional skills competition, their internal conflict will remain unresolved, they will continue to have a feeling of dissatisfaction with themselves and others.
Factors that influence a teacher’s decision to participate in the competition:
Professional and personal interest, the need to transfer acquired experience, the desire to get acquainted with the experience of other teachers.
The desire to acquire a certain professional status.
The desire to improve teaching skills, gain recognition in the teaching community, the desire to become the best.
Each competition has its pros and cons.
Positive sides:
development of creative potential, involvement in research activities;
development of teachers’ competencies, development of an active life position, communication abilities, desire for self-improvement, self-knowledge, self-actualization;
creating a favorable motivational environment for the professional development of teachers;
introduction of new pedagogical technologies into the municipal education sector;
demonstration of one’s professional credo, application of acquired experience in one’s teaching activities, both in the process of training and education, and for further improvement of professional skills;
development of creative abilities, establishment of new connections, development of professional communication in the teaching community, introduction of new pedagogical technologies in the field of education.
the opportunity to express socially significant ideas that are implemented in one’s own practical activities, to accept and introduce the best practices of the best teachers into the educational process.
propaganda of pedagogical ideas and achievements, expansion of the space for active pedagogical communication.
stimulating pedagogical creativity of teachers.
So, competitions of pedagogical excellence are not only a competition, but also an opportunity to communicate with other teachers, organizers, and jury members on a professional level. The competition allows you to get involved in active innovation activities and to most fully implement a person-oriented approach to your professional and career growth. For teachers, participation in the competition means an opportunity to demonstrate their achievements in professional teaching activities, present the results of their work with students, collaboration with parents and the local community. Participation in a competition is a kind of stop, a look at your activities from the outside. Each teaching worker has the opportunity to show that he is a modern teacher, because he uses modern educational technologies, including information and communication technologies; summarizes and disseminates his own teaching experience at the municipal and (or) regional level (master classes, seminars, conferences, round tables, etc.), improves his qualifications and undergoes professional retraining. The competition is a mechanism for the professional development of teachers. It's no secret that effective participation in competitions is an important criterion for a teacher's performance during certification.
Negative sides:
problems in organizing the work day, because not enough time;
stress, tension of the situation, which can bring not only recognition and success, but also failure;
increasing inequality between strong, successful schools and teachers and promising ones, but who do not have the required qualities at the time of the competition, which can lead to either an intensification of efforts aimed at achieving victory in subsequent competitions, or a loss of faith in one’s abilities, decreased motivation, self-esteem, etc. .
Thus, there is a threat of “loss” of potentially capable but insufficiently competent participants at the time of the competition. And this indicates the need to provide other forms of support and development for such a group of teachers, including through changes to the usual competitions. Today in domestic education there are many both defenders and opponents of professional competitions. Some criticize them for their similarity to the show, others for the formalism of the procedure for competitive events.
The main problem of professional teaching competitions is the presentation of teaching activities. How to objectively evaluate a teacher’s skill if he works “behind closed doors”? Usually open lessons are organized for these purposes. However, it is precisely the need to give such lessons that is often the reason for the teacher’s reluctance to participate in the competition. Teachers believe that it is not always possible to correctly assess the quality of their work based on one lesson, especially a presentation lesson. An assessment given on the basis of open lessons that are specially prepared, in their opinion, cannot be considered objective. It does not reflect the effectiveness of a teacher's daily work at school. How to solve this problem?
If we proceed from the fact that in a professional competition, not only the skill of teaching a lesson, but the teacher’s work system is assessed, then the system needs to be presented. In addition to studying open lessons, a fairly complete picture of the level of professionalism is given by teacher developments: original programs, scientific reports, independently prepared visual aids, didactic materials, equipment, as well as planning, notes and scenarios of training sessions, developments for students. You can make a film about the skill of a teacher, telling about his individual laboratory, about what distinguishes him from others; prepare an exhibition of teaching materials, conduct interviews. In other words, the competitor’s work system must be presented holistically.
Based on work experience, we can distinguish several stages of preparation and holding of competitions.
The first stage is “Organizational and preparatory”.
It includes:
Development of the “Regulations on the competition”. The Regulations stipulate
Theme of the competition,
Goal and tasks,
Conditions,
Contents and procedure,
Requirements for the content and design of competition materials,
Criteria for evaluation,
Dates,
Composition of the jury
Procedure for summing up the results of the competition.
There may be appendices to the competition regulations that indicate the application form for participation in the competition or the forms of some other documents (characteristics - submission to an educational institution, etc.).
Familiarization of teachers with the Regulations on the competition with comments and recommendations.
Writing a script or procedure for conducting a competition, choosing a presenter.
Selection of props for the competition, decoration of the premises, acquisition of certificates, gifts, etc.
Providing advisory and practical assistance to teachers in preparing for the competition.
The second stage is “Basic” or “Practical”.
It includes:
Conducting the competition itself according to a pre-written script or plan.
Summing up the results of the competition and rewarding participants and winners.
The third stage is “Final” or “Analytical”.
It includes:
Writing an analytical report on the results of the competition.
Acquaintance with the analytical report at the teachers' council.
Presentation of methodological materials of the competition.
Design of an exhibition of teaching materials, photographic materials, etc. based on the results of the competition.
School education today needs a teacher who can independently obtain the necessary information, identify problems, find ways to solve them, be able to critically analyze the results obtained and creatively apply them in practical activities. The participation of teachers in various competitions allows them to develop and improve their teaching skills.
The international educational portal “Pantry of Entertainment” website website invites preschool teachers, teachers, additional education teachers, educators, students of pedagogical educational institutions to take part in the competition.
The professional competition takes place from May 15 to August 15, 2019
Theme of the competition: “Pedagogical excellence”
The competition accepts original methodological developments that have pedagogical value on the following topics:
Articles on pedagogy, psychology and teaching methods.
Lesson notes for preschoolers.
Lesson notes for schoolchildren.
Consultations for parents of preschoolers (schoolchildren).
Notes from parent meetings.
Master classes for children, teachers or parents.
Games (educational, didactic, role-playing, active, intellectual...) for preschool and school-age children
Notes of conversations with preschoolers
Scenarios of intellectual and sports entertainment for preschoolers and schoolchildren
Interesting educational stories about holidays for preschool and school children
Notes on game activities with preschoolers (schoolchildren)
Holiday scenarios for preschoolers and schoolchildren
Scenarios for game programs for preschoolers and schoolchildren
Scenarios of competitive programs for preschoolers and schoolchildren
Scenarios of extracurricular activities and activities for schoolchildren
Scripts, class notes
Scenarios of leisure programs with fun games, songs, funny competitions and dances
Scenarios for discos, skit parties, tournaments, KVN
Scenarios for summer holidays, scenarios for summer camp events
Procedure for holding the competition
1. The competition is International. We accept works only in Russian.
2. The competition is held among teachers who have blogs on the website
If you don't have a blog and want to take part in the competition, then You need:
Register on the site;
Leave a request to open a blog (follow the link)
After reviewing your application, we open a personal blog for you.
3. You post competition entries yourself on your blog during the period from April 16 to August 15, 2019 inclusive.
At the beginning of the text of the work, be sure to indicate all your complete data (full name, position, place of work).
4. The number of works from one participant is not limited
5. After posting the competition entry on the blog, you leave (follow the link). The application must be submitted within 5 days after posting the work on the blog.(applications for work on the blog posted more than 5 days will not be considered)
6. After receiving your application, the editors conduct an expert review of the work for compliance with competition requirements within 3 business days from the date of placement of the application. If your methodological development meets the competition requirements, then it is assigned a number and placed in the competition table.
If, after 3 working days, your work is not in the competition table, it means that it has not passed the expert review.
We will not report the reason for the refusal, since the work will not be accepted for participation in the competition only if the competition requirements are not met.
Your work remains on the blog. You can take part in the competition, but with a NEW work.
7. Those interested will be able to express their opinion on each of the works and support the participants in the comments to the relevant articles.
8. Collective works are not accepted for the competition.
10. When summing up the results of the competition will be taken into account:
Site administration ratings;
Ratings in comments to the work;
Attention: Only meaningful comments, review comments, and analysis comments will be taken into account.
Comments will be scored from 2-4 points depending on the content and volume of the comment
At the end of each article there is a comment block and social media buttons.
Attention! Each development will be assessed separately. If you propose several methodological developments for participation in the competition and want them to be evaluated jointly, then you need to send a personal message to the site administrator Ulyana Alekseevna before August 15, indicate in it which works need to be combined (numbers of competitive works) and what to call your combined work .
11. August 25, 2019 The results of the competition will be published and the winners announced.
Requirements for competition materials:
Presentations are not accepted for participation in the competition; the presentation can only be as an appendix to the main text of your work. You can read how to post a presentation on a blog;
Materials for which Certificates of Publication have been received or that are participating in other competitions are not accepted for participation in the competition;
A description of the work must be provided (at least 2-3 full sentences): what category of educators (educators, teachers, parents...) will benefit from this material; for children of what age (group, class) is your material intended; describe the use of your material in the educational process.
The submitted material must indicate the purpose, objectives...
If you used any sources when compiling materials (for example, poems by famous poets, aphorisms or quotes from famous people, descriptions of teaching methods or other sources), then you must indicate the authors of these sources;
If photographs, pictures, drawings, diagrams are used in the design of the material, then they must be at least 700 pixels in width, the pictures must be bright in jpg format. Photos and pictures should not contain any extraneous inscriptions (dates, logos, etc.)
Practical materials will not be accepted without photos (illustrations). The number of photos must be at least 5 pieces. The photo size must be at least 700 pixels in width. The photo should not contain children (children's hands), dates or logos of other sites. How to properly arrange and prepare a master class is recorded in detail.
Quizzes, tests, crosswords, test materials must have answers;
The volume of text must be at least 2 printed pages (Times New Roman fonts, 14 point size only. Line spacing - single).
You should not use: headers and footers, footers, embedded objects, frames (labels), frames and fills, objects drawn using MS Word.
The text should not contain links to websites. Only the Authors of poems, works and aphorisms can be indicated in the text.
You can insert a video from YouTube into the text. You can see how to insert a video into text
Bulleted lists can only use standard characters.
It is not allowed to make abbreviations like: V, Vol, R-k, U-k, Ved. etc. It is necessary to write in full: Educator, Child, Student, Leader, etc.
We reserve the right to edit your work and change the title of the work to suit your content;
Additional terms and conditions.
Participation in the Competition means acceptance of the following conditions:
● the organizers of the Competition do not enter into correspondence with participants whose applications were rejected (did not meet the requirements of the Competition);
● the organizers of the Competition reserve the right to use the materials provided for the Competition at their discretion.
If it turns out that your work has already been posted on other sites, or you have violated someone’s Copyright, then the work will be removed from the competition and all previously issued documents will be canceled. Your work remains on the site.
Answers to frequently asked questions
What to do if the material contains a Presentation?
After posting the material on the blog, you send the presentation to us by email sv@site
You must send the presentation before writing an application to participate in the competition. After the presentation appears in your material, you submit an application to participate in the competition. We post presentations within 1-2 days.
The subject line of the email should indicate “Presentation for my blog material.” Presentation requirements are specified
You can also, additionally, instead of slides, insert into this material photos and pictures that your presentation contains (all photos and pictures must be in jpg format, of good quality and without logos of third-party sites, photo size is at least 640 pixels in width).
Why was the methodological development (work) not accepted for participation in the competition?
2. Your work is collected word for word from other people’s texts, or a complete copy of someone else’s work. Your work has low uniqueness (less than 50%).
3. The volume of work is less than 2 pages of printed text.
5. If the work is poorly and sloppily formatted, there are many errors in the text.
How to post a table on a blog?
There is no way to post tables on the blog. Therefore, the table must be presented in the form of an image (picture, illustration) in jpg format, or the table version must be processed into plain text. At the same time, the main part of the methodological development should not consist of tables and pictures.
If the table is necessary from a methodological point of view, then you need to post a summary of the material up to the tables on the blog (description, purpose, objectives, methodological design, etc.), then send the entire summary to us at
In the body of the letter, you must indicate your full name and inform that you want to publish a summary - a table for the material posted on the blog. Be sure to include a link to the blog post for which you are submitting an abstract.
Is it possible to receive a Certificate of Publication for a competition entry?
For your competitive work you can receive a Certificate of Participation, and if you win, a Winner’s Diploma.
We do not issue a certificate of publication for competition work.
If the text of the work contains special characters (for example, in materials on natural science disciplines). How to post such work on a blog?
If your work contains formulas, technical symbols..., then you post the material on the blog before the formulas (description, methodological design, outline of the abstract, etc.), then you need to send the entire abstract to our address
In the body of the letter, you must indicate your full name and inform that you want to publish a summary with formulas for the material posted on the blog. Be sure to include a link to the blog post for which you are submitting an abstract.
Only after posting your abstract, you leave an application for participation in the competition. We post the material within 3 working days.
Do I need to pay money to participate in the competition? Do I need to pay money for Certificates, Diplomas?
No, you don't need to pay for anything.
Participation in the competition and issuance of all documents (Certificate of Participation, Winner Diploma) is free. We don't have any org. contributions.
Participation in all competitions on our portal is free.
Attention!
We do not answer questions asked in comments, in private messages, or via email, the answers to which are contained in the text of this competition regulation. All comments with such questions will remain unanswered or deleted.
Summing up the results of the competition
Number of winners: 10% of the total number of submitted works
The winners of the competition are awarded Diplomas for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place respectively
All competition participants receive Certificates of participation during the competition period.
If it turns out that your work has already been posted on other sites, or you have violated someone’s Copyright, then the work will be removed from the competition and all previously issued documents will be canceled. Your work remains on the site.
Attention!
As soon as your work is placed in the competition table, you can download the Competition Participant Certificate within 14 days from the date of placing your work in the competition table.
Procedure for obtaining a Competition Participant Certificate
As soon as your work is placed in the competition table, the “Download Certificate” button appears on the page with your material (next to the “Edit” and “Delete” buttons).
You can download the Competition Participant Certificate within 14 days from the date of approval of your application.
Samples of Diploma and Certificate
 |
Works of participants of past competitions
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from January 15 to April 15, 2019
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from September 15 to December 15, 2018
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from May 15 to August 15, 2018
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from January 15 to April 15, 2018
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from September 15 to December 15, 2017
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from May 15 to August 15, 2017
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from January 15 to April 15, 2017
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from September 15 to December 15, 2016
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from May 15 to August 15, 2016
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from January 15 to April 15, 2016
- International professional competition of pedagogical excellence from September 15 to December 15
Competitors
|
Participant #1 |
|
|
Participant #2 |
|
|
Participant #3 |
|
|
Participant #4 |
|
|
Participant #5 Didactic materials for children of senior preschool age “Relief of Kuzbass” in accordance with the requirements of Montessori pedagogy |
